Online Exam Integrity
Protect the value of your credentials with secure, privacy-respecting remote assessment monitoring.
Timestamped, reviewable events — not hours of raw footage.
Prioritize reviewer time with severity-weighted decisions.
Automated signals support reviewers; they never replace them.
The integrity challenge in remote assessment
Online exams face growing threats: AI-assisted cheating tools, remote desktop software, screen sharing, and impersonation. Organizations need defensible integrity evidence without driving candidate anxiety or legal pushback.
Signal intelligence, not surveillance
- Face presence and identity verification
- Tab switching and window focus changes
- AI-assisted answers: pasted in from outside the exam, written without typing, or clicked by software
- Remote desktop and screen sharing tools
- Requests from the exam page to blocklisted domains
Trust scores for scalable decisions
- Auto-approve low-risk sessions
- Prioritize spot-checks for borderline cases
- Escalate high-risk sessions for full investigation
Human review remains central
Automated signals support reviewers — they do not replace them. Every flag is contestable, and your team retains full control over final decisions.
Privacy-respecting by design
Integrity monitoring does not require uploading hours of candidate video. Local processing keeps the candidate experience respectful while delivering the evidence your program needs.
Get started
Explore our interactive demo or request a demo for a walkthrough tailored to your assessment program.
Related guides
Dive deeper with guides from our articles library.
Signal vs. Surveillance: The Real Privacy Impact of Screen Recording During Exams
Continuous cloud screen recording during exams creates severe privacy liabilities. Learn why the industry is shifting toward on-device signal telemetry.
Read articlePedagogy & ethicsBuilding a Culture of Integrity: From Surveillance to Signal Intelligence
A modern integrity philosophy: extract only what matters, preserve dignity, and keep humans accountable for outcomes.
Read articlePedagogy & ethicsEthics in AI Proctoring: Bias, Fairness, and the Human-in-the-Loop
How to design and operate proctoring that avoids biased outcomes, documents limitations, and keeps humans accountable.
Read articleVertical solutionsSecure Exams for Finance and Healthcare: Meeting High-Stake Compliance
What “court-grade” evidence means for regulated certifications, and how to capture audit trails without storing raw streams.
Read articleFrequently Asked Questions
Common questions about privacy, compliance, and integration.
How does ProctorSafe protect exam integrity?
Can reviewers investigate flagged sessions?
Does integrity monitoring slow down exams?
Is this suitable for high-stakes certification exams?
Ready to Get Started?
Start a free trial and run real sessions against your own application, try the interactive demo in your browser, or contact us for a walkthrough tailored to your program.